AccelQ vs Cypress

Accelq helps us manage plenty of execution agents through its Agent Command Center dashboard. Even if we encounter a few issues with Desktop UI, we can conveniently access CLI and perform our testing without any hindrance. Its element ID module is useful whenever we work with an array of operator types for our customer's bank transaction attributes.

- Mohana R.

- No need for programming language knowledge for automation with AccelQ - Natural language coding made automation very simple - Support a variety of applications for automation - Automation with AccelQ is just fun. It is like joining blocks together correctly to make building. Even person who does not have any automation background can learn and automate quickly with AccelQ

- Milind J.

For those with no automation skills, AccelQ is the BEST tool to start with. No coding skills are required. This is an easy-to-use command- simple English Test Data generation tool. Functional testers find it very easy to upskill themselves with this tool and contribute to automation. AccelQ is flexible to automate Web, mobile, and salesforce applications as well as API testing. AccelQ is easy to set-up, easy to learn, understand and implement. Using this tool had effectively reduced the time and effort in software testing.

- Bharathi D.

I am working with Cypress for over 3 years. This framework is reliable, fast, and user-friendly. Failed tests debugging is enjoyable with a detailed open mode console. The amount of functionalities is amazing and its usage usually is just as simple as entering one or two methods. Each test is recorded/screenshotted if failed. Adaptation to users' needs is vast - multiple configs if needed, different types of tests (frontend, API), a huge amount of open-source plugins ready to work within two terminal commands, and much more. Documentation, as well as customer support, help greatly with all problems and questions. In 95%, if you have a bug, somewhere there is a solution. However, Cypress has some downsides, like a lack of native parallelization support (which needs an external cloud). Some functionalities (because of the framework architecture) are not supported (iframes) or resolved in a strange way (real mouse hover). Also, the structure of the tests (cy.get...) may be confusing at the start, especially since it is completely different from Selenium syntax. To sum up this review, Cypress is an amazing piece of code, that helped me greatly through the years. It has some specific problems and a unique structure, but when understood and used correctly it is extremally powerful and can be widely implemented to handle apps testing.

- Piotr P.

A really revolutional tool for web testing. We have integrated cypress tests with our application deployment pipeline. We couldn't do it before with our Selenium tests because of their flakiness.

- Igor S.

They are active in the Atlanta development community which I really appreciate. They have made a great product and they continue to listen to what users want.

- Ryan R.