BrowserStack vs Wiser

Test websites & experiments without needing lots of devices / browsers / operating systems Tests on REAL devices, rather than just simulated A few times we've seen bugs that we've not been able to replicate with that actual device, but this has been quite rare

- Lee Preston

It's easy to use it to test web pages and applications for code error, adaptability, and responsiveness. It saves cost by eliminating the need to invest in computers and mobile devices. Great for cross platform browsing and it supports all the major browsers. The Chrome extension is useful for testing apps running locally. It uses a lot of system resources when in operation. It can be slow at times. It's pricey.

- Frank Emerson

Lots of devices available. Easy to manage. Transparent pricing plans. The price is huge compared to the competitor. Support resolution is a little bit slow even before COVID. Mobile devices are not available in all variants.

- Ebin Elias

We used to have five people working full-time gathering and inputting data, at a rate of about 200 SKUs a day, but with Wiser, we’ve been able to gather content on roughly 20,000 SKUs in three weeks while cutting our staff down to one person.

- Jeff Minor CIO & CTO Goedecker’s

It’s really a remarkable process and Wiser did a great job of showing us how to write the recipes (descriptions of the content desired) so we would collect exactly the information we needed. They scaled the project into manageable milestones, and we were fully using the product after training and guidance.

- Kirsten Dehaai Director of eCommerce Marketing HP Products

A lot of software packages are good at collecting data but not at consolidating it. The pain point for us was that we needed expertise in both the technology as well as how to make the most of the data. The Wiser team and the Wiser technology addressed both.

- Rick Caldwell