ClaimMaster vs Grammatica

Antecedent checking for claims. This is terrific. After you have checked your claims, the software can then enumerate every place in the specification where support can be found. Likewise, it can check part numbers and verify them versus the drawings. This is especially good for finding slight, unintended shifts in terminology. Finally, the software does a great job of manipulating claimsets during prosecution.

- Charles R. Managing Member

ClaimMaster provides key application and claim review functionality for patent and office action drafting. The time saving utilities (claim renumbering, status indicator updating, etc.) are also very helpful. The ability to work offline is key in some instances.

- Howard H. Patent Attorney

I do wish the parsing features worked a little more rapidly, or more in the background - I can't use Word while they operate. I also get several false positives from antecedent basis and drawing reference number checks. These are easy to ignore, but would be great to resolve or customize.

- David M. Patent Attorney

Overall the tool serves as a good way for students to correct their writing and create better quality papers, but it is on them to take the extra step to figure out what they did wrong. Since they are not encouraged to do so and given the answer, this is often not to be the case. It is a great tool for final correction, but shouldn't be relied on for education purposes.

- Steven L.

It is just a tool, it is more for individual. I think its a very good tool for students who is learning to write, they could be confident to write sentences and they could know fast when they are wrong

- Lu W.

Designed for those who need a little help with grammar, Grammatica comes with potential privacy trade-offs and is best-suited for those who don’t mind the interrupting nature of the keyboard.

- Marisa Moore MBA, RDN, LD