Cypress vs Rapise

I am working with Cypress for over 3 years. This framework is reliable, fast, and user-friendly. Failed tests debugging is enjoyable with a detailed open mode console. The amount of functionalities is amazing and its usage usually is just as simple as entering one or two methods. Each test is recorded/screenshotted if failed. Adaptation to users' needs is vast - multiple configs if needed, different types of tests (frontend, API), a huge amount of open-source plugins ready to work within two terminal commands, and much more. Documentation, as well as customer support, help greatly with all problems and questions. In 95%, if you have a bug, somewhere there is a solution. However, Cypress has some downsides, like a lack of native parallelization support (which needs an external cloud). Some functionalities (because of the framework architecture) are not supported (iframes) or resolved in a strange way (real mouse hover). Also, the structure of the tests (cy.get...) may be confusing at the start, especially since it is completely different from Selenium syntax. To sum up this review, Cypress is an amazing piece of code, that helped me greatly through the years. It has some specific problems and a unique structure, but when understood and used correctly it is extremally powerful and can be widely implemented to handle apps testing.

- Piotr P.

A really revolutional tool for web testing. We have integrated cypress tests with our application deployment pipeline. We couldn't do it before with our Selenium tests because of their flakiness.

- Igor S.

They are active in the Atlanta development community which I really appreciate. They have made a great product and they continue to listen to what users want.

- Ryan R.

Connection with SpiraTest and Microsoft Team System. Script for Firefox and Google Chrome.

- Valeria K.

Rapise the ability to initially record basic automation sequences and then generate code. The code can then be integrated with Java Script which makes the whole script extremely powerful. The learned objects can be overwritten with xpath specific values within the script providing the ability to construct dynamic object references.

- Phil C.

Because is fast, easy, include all technologies of web developments to generate automatic and editable scripts and perform its wiith clear and complete reports about the results of the test execution Automating testing in crossbrowsing is very very effective in IE, Mozilla Firefox, Chrome, Safari and Opera The integration with Spira Team, Spira Plan and Spira Testing is very good too.

- Liberal R.